Water-based | American Coatings Association Coatings Protect. Coatings Preserve. Coatings Provide. Thu, 18 Dec 2025 19:56:14 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.4 /wp-content/uploads/2019/09/cropped-fav-150x150.png Water-based | American Coatings Association 32 32 Enhancing Coating Performance without Using Fluorocarbon Surfactants in Water-Based Formulations /coatingstech-magazine/articles/enhancing-coating-performance-without-using-fluorocarbon-surfactants-in-water-based-formulations/ Thu, 18 Dec 2025 19:56:14 +0000 /?post_type=ct_articles&p=255034

By Brian Vest, Lichang Zhou, Linda Adamson, and Celine Burel, Syensqo

Perfluoro-and polyfluorinated-alkyl substances (PFAS) have been widely used for a variety of applications, including water-resistant fabrics, nonstick cookware, stain-resistant carpets, firefighting foams, food packaging, and some personal care products. Their unique properties of resisting heat, oil, grease, and water make them highly versatile across various sectors. One type of these chemicals, fluorocarbon surfactants (FCS), has been used specifically in waterborne coatings for improving early “hot block” resistance. However, risk management and upcoming regulations are driving formulators to eliminate the use of these chemicals from their formulations. This has led to a balancing act for formulators as they try to move to more sustainable additives without sacrificing performance.

This study will cover the efforts made in our group for the use of novel phosphate ester wetting agents which deliver improved early hot block resistance without the adverse environmental concerns of fluorocarbon chemistry. These novel alkyl phenol ethoxylate (APE)-free and very low volatile organic compound (VOC) specialty additives deliver improved colloidal stability, which helps provide a combination of wetting, dispersing, and compatibility properties to the finished water-based coating. Data will highlight overall paint performance and touch upon structure/property relationships that lead to improved anti-blocking performance.

Introduction

Manufacturers of waterborne coatings are increasingly facing stringent regulatory requirements to transition towards environmentally sustainable formulations. These formulations must not only exhibit low volatile organic compound (VOC) levels but also eliminate hazardous substances such as alkyl phenol ethoxylates (APEs) and fluorocarbon surfactants (FCS). This regulatory landscape presents a formidable challenge for formulators who are tasked with integrating eco-friendly additives while maintaining the integrity and performance of the coatings.

FCS pose a particular challenge for formulators due to their distinctive molecular structure and the comprehensive balance of properties they impart to formulations. A critical performance attribute provided by FCS is early-stage—specifically, 1-day dry—hot block resistance. This property is essential in waterborne semi-gloss to gloss formulations designed for low-VOC applications. For decades, FCS have been instrumental in achieving this performance characteristic without adversely impacting other application properties. However, FCS belong to a broader category of chemicals known as perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are classified as substances of very high concern (SVHC). PFAS are of significant health concern due to their persistent nature, as they do not readily degrade and can accumulate in the environment and in the human body over time, earning them the moniker “forever chemicals.”1 Consequently, there is mounting regulatory pressure globally to identify safe and environmentally benign alternatives to fluorosurfactants across various industries.

In response to the demands within architectural coatings, an extensive study of alternative technologies was undertaken, with a concentrated emphasis on waterbased architectural coatings. This rigorous investigation identified that modifications to a specific phosphate ester chemistry could provide an effective solution, yielding superior early-stage hot block resistance while maintaining a comprehensive balance of application properties. This research culminated in the development of an innovative anti-blocking additive tailored for waterborne coatings.

Background

Block resistance is the capability of a paint when applied to two surfaces to not stick upon contact when pressure is applied under various temperature and humidity conditions. For example, good block resistance helps keep a door from sticking to the jamb or a window from sticking to its frame. When the two painted surfaces are pressed together, chain diffusion and entanglement occur from the mobile polymer chain ends, resulting in poor block resistance. Several factors can influence the blocking resistance of a formulation, such as the polymer Tg, the formulation space, and the type of surface-active additives being used. Figure 1 is a cartoon schematic demonstrating good and poor block resistance.

FIGURE 1 Cartoon schematic of block resistance.

FCS are commonly used to improve blocking resistance in waterborne formulations by providing a “protective layer” at the surface, thereby preventing the polymer-to-polymer entanglement (Figure 1). However, due to the environmental challenges and regulations of fluorocarbon chemistry, formulators need a new additive solution to improve block resistance. The scope of this project was to identify an additive that could be easily used by the formulator, either as a post-add to an emulsion or added directly into the formulation, which could match the block resistance performance of fluorosurfactant chemistry without the environmental concerns.

]]>
The Impact of Microfibrillated Cellulose on the Rheology of Water-based Acrylic Satin Paint upon Tinting /coatingstech-magazine/articles/the-impact-of-microfibrillated-cellulose-on-the-rheology-of-water-based-acrylic-satin-paint-upon-tinting/ Tue, 09 Jul 2024 20:33:21 +0000 /?post_type=ct_articles&p=247739 In this article, the authors will demonstrate how MFC can improve the resistance to viscosity loss upon tinting without sacrificing the flow/leveling properties of the coating.

Associative thickeners are commonly used to thicken water-based coatings. Their mechanism of action is based on the hydrophobic interaction between the hydrophobic polymer groups as well as with the surface of the binder latex particles. It is commonly known that associative thickener-based formulations are prone to viscosity loss upon tinting due to the surfactants present in the tinting systems, leading to poorer sag resistance.

In this work, the effect of an insoluble microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) was studied on the prevention of viscosity loss on tinting with a deep tone base, formulated with two different hydrophobically modified polyurethane associative thickeners (HEURs), combined with a non-associative MFC thickener. The formulations were evaluated in terms of rheology, viscosity, sag resistance, flow/leveling, and gloss.

FIGURE 1 Scanning electron microscope image of MFC.
The compatibility and rheological behavior of MFC has previously been studied in water based acrylic and epoxy systems.3,4 The results from these studies showed that MFC dispersed very well into the resins and showed good compatibility. In addition, the viscosity and sag resistance increased with increasing concentration of MFC. Furthermore, the dispersions were heat stable in terms of sedimentation and retention of rheological properties. An example of the compatibility and stabilization effects of the fibrils is shown in Figure 2. The interaction of the OH-groups, via hydrogen bonding, on the surface of the entangled fibrils and the components (before shear) allows the increased stability of the formulation. Under shear forces (during shear) the disruption breaks the hydrogen bonding between the fibrils and OH-groups with the other components. Introduction of new components, such as the binder, interact with the open structure of the fibrillar network. Once shearing has stopped (after shear) the OH-groups and fibrils envelop the binder along with the original components, in-turn reforming the hydrogen bonding, allowing for increased stability of the formulation as well as increased compatibility.
FIGURE 2 Effect of shearing the microfibrillar network and the interaction with additional components (black dots) before, during and after shear.

Materials and Methods

Commercially available MFC was used in this study (manufactured by Borregaard AS) containing 10 wt % MFC in water. The following universal colorants were used for tinting: Lamp Black, Red Iron Oxide, and Phthalo Blue (8 oz/gal). Sag resistance was determined according to ASTM D4440 by using byko-chart 2852 and a LENETA Anti-Sag Meter “ASM-4 MEDIUM-RANGE” (4 mils (100 μm) – 24 mils (600 μm)); flow/leveling was determined according to ASTM D4062. The rheology was measured with an Anton Paar rheometer using a bob and cup measuring geometry.

Results and Discussion

Effect of MFC on the Rheology of an Acrylic Binder

A simplified binder formulation was first used for studying the impact of MFC on the viscosity after tinting of an acrylic waterborne system (Table 1). The formulation was based on an anionic dispersion of an acrylic copolymer containing Rheology Modifier 1, a HEUR for low-shear viscosity adjustment.

The strong impact of MFC to the low-shear viscosity of the formulations can be seen from Figure 3. Before tinting, the low-shear viscosity of the HEUR A formulation is 239 Pa.s, whereas the viscosity of the MFC B formulation is 964 Pa.s. After tinting, all lowshear viscosities of the HEUR-based systems decrease, most noticeably for the Lamp Black and Phthalo Blue formulations. In the case of both the MFC formulations (B and C), the low-shear viscosities increase dramatically when compared to the HEUR-based formulations both before and after tinting with all the tested universal colorants. Regarding the MFC C formulation, the low-shear viscosities actually have a large increase when a universal colorant is introduced, most notably with Phthalo Blue (2440 Pa.s. vs. 6340 Pa.s).
FIGURE 3 Low-shear viscosities for untinted and tinted (Lamp Black, Red Iron Oxide, and Phthalo Blue) formulations after 24 hours.
This noticeable increase in viscosity with MFC might be due to two reasons. Firstly, the physical entanglement of the nanosize fibrils and hydrogen bonding between the hydroxyl groups of MFC and hydrogen bonding compounds in the formulation are aiding the thickening effect. Secondly, the universal colorants typically contain glycol and glycol ethers, which are also known to strengthen the network of MFC. Based on these two reasons, the addition of MFC into the formulations positively impacts the lowshear viscosity on tinting, as seen especially with the MFC C formulations (Figure 3).
Continue reading in the July-August digital issue of CoatingsTech
]]>